Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to andrewbrakey.com

Andrew Brakey · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
65match
andrewjzajac.com
Andrew Zajac | Software Engineer
2 shared topicsweb-development
65match
andrewgarcia.dev
Andrew Garcia | Software Engineer
2 shared topicsweb-development
65match
andrewstout.dev
Andrew Stout - Software Developer
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
65match
andrewspies.dev
Andrew Spies | Software Developer
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
64match
alexandresuete.dev
Alexandre.Suete
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
64match
andrewdesmith.com
Andrew D.E. Smith, Software Developer
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
64match
andrewphillip.dev
Andrew Phillip – Software Developer
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
63match
andropay.net
ANDROPAY
2 shared topicsweb-development
63match
longoandrea.com
Andrea Longo - Web Developer
2 shared topicsweb-development
63match
andreykh.io
Andrey{K}h - Software Engineer
2 shared topicsweb-development
63match
andreykh.net
Andrey{K}h - Software Engineer
2 shared topicsweb-development
63match
andreykh.app
Andrey{K}h - Software Engineer
2 shared topicsweb-development
63match
andriydrozd.com
Andriy Drozd
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
62match
paasport.com
PaaSPort-login
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
62match
terus.dev
Andrei Terus - React Native Developer
2 shared topicsweb-development
62match
ablancolopez.com
Alejandro Blanco
2 shared topicsweb-development
62match
aledev.tech
Alexandre Talles - Software Engineer Portfolio
2 shared topicsweb-development
62match
elabogadodelaraza.com
Alexandre Attar | Software Engineering Student
2 shared topicsweb-development

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.