similar sites

‹ Profile AI Report Tools

Sites similar to andreucci.dev

Newbic (Antonio Andreucci) · GitHub · ranked by shared content topics & relevance

Nuschler (Jimmy Verducci) · GitHub

2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

Any Distro · GitHub

2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

brunorrr (Bruno Ricci) · GitHub

2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

dimflows (Daniel Haro) · GitHub

2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

pneugebala (Andreas N.) · GitHub

2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

monoforge-dev · GitHub

2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

andresfb (Andres Bastidas) · GitHub

2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

komtech-bayerwald.com

Luncher91 (Andreas Lenzen) · GitHub

2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

anyfld · GitHub

2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications

dintho · GitHub

2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

andrevechina.com

andrevechina (André Vechina) · GitHub

2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

dmizr (David Mizrahi) · GitHub

2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

krazos · GitHub

2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

maatko (Matko) · GitHub

2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

thatrex (Rex) · GitHub

2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

thexman · GitHub

2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

geferay · GitHub

2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

Madhour · GitHub

2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.