Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to andretl.com

André Luís · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
70match
andrestorhaug.com
André Storhaug
2 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
68match
andrelizardo.com
André Lizardo | Substack
2 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
64match
andrewgao.dev
Andrew Gao
2 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
64match
andriu.dev
Andrés Sanjuán | Portfolio
2 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
64match
modelprose.com
Buddy Hadry
2 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
64match
andrewscouten.com
Andrew Scouten
2 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
64match
andrewywu.com
Andrew Wu
2 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
64match
andrewlombardi.com
Andrew Lombardi
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
anthonymarinov.com
Anthony Marinov
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
revaldyhfz.com
Revaldy Hafizhy Mukhtar · Portfolio
2 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
63match
divya-bairavarasu.com
Divya Bairavarasu | Full Stack Developer
2 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
63match
plene.ai
plene.ai - prompt engineering tools
2 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
63match
andrewjlavoie.com
Andrew Lavoie — Solutions Engineering Leader & GenAI Architect
2 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
63match
divijworks.com
N Divij — AI Engineer & Systems Builder
2 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
63match
shivammisra.com
Shivam Misra - AI Engineer
2 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
63match
andraewilliams.com
Andrae Williams
2 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
63match
andromedan.ai
Andromedan
2 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
63match
cameron-gera.com
Cameron Gera's website
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.