Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to andreparr.com

André Parr | Interaction Designer · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
75match
sherylgao.com
Sheryl — Interaction Designer
2 shared topicsdesign
75match
andrzejradziejowski.com
Interaction Designer Portfolio
2 shared topicsdesign
74match
ethanligondesign.com
digital accessibility and interaction design
2 shared topicsdesign
73match
korkmazvar.com
Korkmaz Varis - UI/UX, Product & Interaction Designer
2 shared topicsdesign
72match
pixellou.com
Lisa Williams | Visual and Interaction Designer
2 shared topicsdesign
72match
heterogondesign.com
Interaction Design - Michael Schade
2 shared topicsdesign
71match
henrikmiers.com
Henrik Miers – Experience & Interaction Designer
2 shared topicsdesign
71match
offhour.dev
offhour / interactive design studio
2 shared topicsdesign
70match
andrepahl.com
André Pahl
2 shared topicsdesign
70match
ricardoarevalo.com
Ricardo Arévalo - Interactive Designer
2 shared topicsdesign
70match
mohammedyarroum.com
Mohammed Yarroum - Interdisciplinary Designer
2 shared topicsdesign
70match
revdesign.com
Rev Design International
2 shared topicsdesign
69match
ivoherrmann.com
Ivo Herrmann – Designer
2 shared topicsdesign
69match
ricardadrianza.com
Ricard Adrianza – Interaction Design | Art Direction
2 shared topicsdesign
69match
andrecesarini.com
André Cesarini - Senior Product Designer
2 shared topicsdesign
69match
anlcr.com
anlcr | digital designer
2 shared topicsdesign
69match
andreaugusto.com
Andre Augusto - Designer
2 shared topicsdesign
69match
andrejacoby.com
André Jacoby | UX-Designer
2 shared topicsdesign

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.