Piperic
similar sites
‹ profileTools

Sites similar to andreic.com

Andrei Cherciu | Software Engineer · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
80match
ankanpal.com
Ankan Pal | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
80match
sharmayash.com
Yash Sharma | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
79match
reuss.dev
Tobias Reuß | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
79match
andreidi.com
Andrei Diaconu - Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
79match
ivinay.dev
Vinay Naik | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
78match
gedasga.com
GedasGa | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
78match
heinsoe.com
Hein Soe | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
78match
andreitalpa.com
Andrei Talpa — Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
78match
konin.dev
Max Konin | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
78match
islamihab.com
Islam Ihab | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
78match
kofimupati.com
Kofi Mupati | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
78match
itshamzajaved.com
Hamza Javed | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
78match
calculated-code.com
calculatedCode | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
78match
dnuge.dev
Daniel Nugent | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
78match
bbautista.dev
Billy Bautista | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
78match
jakebuceac.com
Jake Buceac | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
77match
lwebb.dev
Logan Webb | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
77match
anjukaranji.com
Anju Karanji - Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.