similar sites

‹ Profile AI Report Tools

Sites similar to andiwinter.com

Andi Winter – Writer, Reader, Tea Drinker, Chrononaut · ranked by shared content topics & relevance

eunicekimwrites.com

Eunice Kim – Writer, Reader, Dreamer

2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

Amrauthor Writer, Reader, and Bookish

2 shared topicsfiction

thewriterreader.com

The Writer Reader – Madelyn M. White

2 shared topicsfiction

Amy Knepper – writer

2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

angelajdawson.com

Angela J Dawson – Writer – Author

2 shared topicsfiction

Mandy Hager – Writer

2 shared topicsfiction

dereksowers.com

Derek Sowers – Writer, Designer, Cat Dad

2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

Andy Mozina – Writer * Teacher

2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

Chimedum Ohaegbu – Editor / Writer / Reader

2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

m huw evans — editor — writer — reader

2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

Kim Bundy – Writer

2 shared topicsfiction

andrewblossom.com

Andrew Blossom – Writer, editor, publisher, cat mother.

2 shared topicsfiction

andrewblossom.org

Andrew Blossom – Writer, editor, publisher, cat mother.

2 shared topicsfiction

adrickbrock.com

Adrick Brock – Writer

2 shared topicsfiction

Anais Lughe – WRITER

2 shared topicsfiction

kindrawhite.com

Kindra White – Writer

2 shared topicsfiction

paula-morris.com

Paula Morris – Writer

2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

andy-southall.com

Andy Southall – Writer

2 shared topicsfiction

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.