Piperic
similar sites
‹ profileTools

Sites similar to andersvane.com

An author's life | Vane | Substack · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
74match
esotericamag.com
Esoterica Magazine | Substack
2 shared topicsfiction
71match
gardenofanxiety.com
Kruger Writes | Substack
2 shared topicsfiction
71match
annkyner.com
Ann Kyner | Substack
2 shared topicsfiction
71match
escapistcafe.com
Escapist Cafe | Prakash Chougule | Substack
2 shared topicsfiction
70match
hernamewasvonvellain.com
Von Vellain | Substack
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
70match
shesaidwithlove.com
She Said With Love | Jenn | Substack
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
70match
angelicathorne.com
Angelica Thorne | 1980s Fiction, Books & Belonging | Substack
2 shared topicsfiction
70match
anoveldetour.com
A Novel Detour | Coleen | Substack
2 shared topicsfiction
69match
andromedandreams.com
Andromedan Dreams | Pawel | Substack
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
69match
sushilawood.com
Awe & Angst by Sushila Wood | Substack
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
68match
anatderacine.com
Anat Deracine | Author
2 shared topicsfiction
68match
essloane.com
E. S. Sloane | Fiction Author
2 shared topicsfiction
67match
conversationdaemon.com
The Conversation Daemon | BØY Chaiharan | Substack
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
67match
djbowden.com
DJ Bowden's Official Author Website
2 shared topicsfiction
67match
garysbooks.com
Posts | Gary's Books
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
66match
helenmun.com
Helen Mun Author Web Site
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
66match
rhettsloaneauthor.com
Rhett Sloane | Conspiracy Thriller Author
2 shared topicsfiction
66match
annahawthorne.com
Anna S. Hawthorne | Author
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.