Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to anderj.net

James Anderson - Software Engineer · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
80match
rohangore.com
Rohan Gore - Software Engineer
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
79match
alexandermkwan.dev
Alexander Kwan - Full-Stack Software Engineer
2 shared topicsweb-development
78match
ahmed-dev.tech
Ahmed Shafi - Senior Software Engineer
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
78match
arnointech.com
Software Engineer Portfolio
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
78match
matyasfodor.com
Matyas Fodor Software Engineer
2 shared topicsweb-development
78match
firlana.com
Software Engineer
2 shared topicsweb-development
78match
ben-bricker.com
Ben Bricker | Software Engineer
2 shared topicsweb-development
77match
krissolui.com
Kris Lui | Software Engineer
2 shared topicsweb-development
77match
kunal-jain.com
Kunal Jain - Software Engineer
2 shared topicsweb-development
77match
rizkyzhang.com
Home | Software Engineer
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
77match
agas.dev
Agastya - Software Engineer
2 shared topicsweb-development
77match
robertdelacruz.com
Robert De La Cruz | Software Engineer
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
76match
felixrowen.com
Felix Rowen | Fullstack Software Engineer
2 shared topicsweb-development
76match
romaura.com
Robbin Ramos - Software Engineer
2 shared topicsweb-development
76match
bgrove.io
Bryan Grove - Software Engineer
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
76match
kylepaulsen.com
Kyle Paulsen, Software Engineer
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
76match
pierres.dev
Pierre Smith | Software Engineer
2 shared topicsweb-development
76match
roiguri.com
Roi Guri - Software Engineer
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.