Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to anadukakis.com

Ana Dukakis · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
70match
ana-diaz.com
Ana Diaz
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
65match
biancaagaton.com
Bianca Agaton – Narrative Designer | Game Writer | Writer
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
65match
chellaramanan.com
Chella Ramanan - Malmö, Sweden, Chella Writes | about.me
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
65match
annieshi.me
Annie Shi
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
64match
cameronconnick.co.uk 🇬🇧
Cameron Connick | Game Designer
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
64match
anabettencourt.com
Game Producer / Product Manager | Ana Waddington Bettencourt
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
64match
rescoopstudio.com
Re:SCOOP Studio - Crafting Game Experiences for Malaysia & Beyond
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
64match
pavelosminin.com
Pavel Osminin - PAVEL OSMININ
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
64match
charlottecouder.com
Charlotte Couder – Level & Narrative Designer – Portfolio
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
64match
ifeoodenk.com
Narrative Systems Journal
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
64match
kirbuyanin.com
KIRILL BUYANIN - Professional
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
64match
mammonmachine.com
Portfolio | Mammon Machine
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
64match
pearlsroses.com
Pearls & Roses - Crafting Pixels, Powering Play
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
64match
acegiak.net
Ash McAllan's microblog
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
64match
alanafernandes.org
Alana Fernandes
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
64match
manaworlds.com
Mana Worlds
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
64match
adamfenderson.me
Adam Fenderson | Professional Game Designer
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
64match
andrewkuhar.com
Andrew Kuhar
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.