Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to amymalinowski.com

Amy Malinowski // UX Designer and Researcher · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
74match
nathanielsg.com
User Experience (UI/UX) Designer and Researcher - Nathaniel
2 shared topicsdesign
73match
andersaxelwallace.com
Anders Axel Wallace | UX Researcher + Designer
2 shared topicsdesign
72match
amydai.com
amy dai – UX Designer
2 shared topicsdesign
72match
naningutoyo.com
naningutoyo | UX Research & Design
2 shared topicsdesign
72match
n8tanner.com
Nate Tanner | UX Researcher
2 shared topicsdesign
72match
renmartindoike.com
Ren Martin-Doike - UX Research & Design
2 shared topicsdesign
72match
angiedelgadoux.com
Angie Delgado UX Design and Research
2 shared topicsdesign
71match
bettihatvani.com
Betti Hatvani • UX Designer / Researcher
2 shared topicsdesign
71match
andreawilliamsdesign.com
UX Researcher | Andrea Williams Design
2 shared topicsdesign
71match
nathanromero.com
Nathan Romero – Product Designer
2 shared topicsdesign
70match
devonpeet.com
Devon Peet | UX Designer
2 shared topicsdesign
70match
derekux.com
Derek Stein - UX Researcher & Designer
2 shared topicsdesign
70match
theahines.com
Thea Hines - UX Designer
2 shared topicsdesign
70match
amritakar.com
UX designer | Amrita Kar
2 shared topicsdesign
70match
aniamacksey.com
Ania Macksey - UX Researcher & Designer
2 shared topicsdesign
70match
chiifolio.com
Chiini Lin – UX Designer
2 shared topicsdesign
70match
designedbynadia.com
Nadia Hussain, UX Designer Portfolio
2 shared topicsdesign
70match
nathanchitayat.com
Nathan Chitayat - Product and UX Designer
2 shared topicsdesign

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.