Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to amykaffka.com

Amy Kaffka | Senior Creative and Director · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
74match
annamagni.com
Anna Magni — Creative Director and Designer
1 shared topicsdesign
73match
andrehull.com
Creative Director Andre
1 shared topicsdesign
73match
andykeene.com
Creative Director Andy Keene
1 shared topicsdesign
73match
aminswessi.com
Amin Swessi – Designer & Creative Director
1 shared topicsdesign
73match
chimera-design.com
David Edwards | Senior Art Director
1 shared topicsdesign
73match
kikuruiz.com
Kiku Ruiz - Creative Art Director
1 shared topicsdesign
73match
nadbuchanan.com
nad*buchanan // creative director
1 shared topicsdesign
72match
andrewmckee.net
Andrew McKee | Creative Director & Brand Designer — Atlanta, GA
1 shared topicsdesign
72match
chase-rowan.com
Chase Rowan - Creative Director and Designer from Dallas, TX
1 shared topicsdesign
72match
kimirareddy.com
Kimira Reddy Creative Director
1 shared topicsdesign
72match
charlondegraav.com
Charlon - Sr. Art Director / Creative
1 shared topicsdesign
72match
nadiaborjesson.com
Motion Creative & Art Director - Nadia Börjesson
1 shared topicsdesign
72match
evandehaven.com
Evan deHaven - Creative Director Portfolio
1 shared topicsdesign
72match
illuquent.com
Emre Nachtwein — Experience Designer & Creative Director
1 shared topicsdesign
72match
andrewlwilcox.com
Andrew L. Wilcox | Creative Director
1 shared topicsdesign
72match
devinwakefield.com
Devin Wakefield | Creative Director
1 shared topicsdesign
72match
euniejang.com
EUNIE JANG | Senior Art Director - Work
1 shared topicsdesign
72match
anniegrotophorst.com
Annie Grotophorst — Senior Art Director & Brand Designer
1 shared topicsdesign

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.