Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to amyfarrell.net

Amy Farrell · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
66match
andymorrell.net
Andy Morrell
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
65match
derrellnofiel.com
Derrell Nofiel
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
derekfarr.com
Derek Farr | Derek Farr
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
63match
amyjeanes.com
Amy Jeanes
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
63match
arrecho.tech
Arrecho Tech
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
63match
nabilfarhan.com
Nabil Farhan
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
63match
richardfaria.com
Richard Faria
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
62match
devinfarmer.com
Devin K. Farmer
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
62match
manualandmethod.com
Manual & Method
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
62match
theactualtime.com
The Actual Time
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
62match
eukota.com
Darrell Ross – Engineer, Mathematician, Musician, Father
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
62match
pascualdesigner.com
Pascual Developer
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
62match
axual.cloud
Axual Self Service
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
62match
peperell.com
Matt Peperell's Blog
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
62match
devorus.com
Garrett — Portfolio
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
62match
rex-studio.com
Rex-studio.com - Home
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
62match
aviewfrommyisland.com
Home - Matthew Kligerman
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
62match
alexandernavarretealvarez.com
Alexander Navarrete Alvarez
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.