Piperic
similar sites
‹ profileTools

Sites similar to amy-decoded.com

Amy Kwak — Software Engineer · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
83match
hekdev.com
Erik Kleiman — Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
82match
ankanpal.com
Ankan Pal | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
82match
ethanloh.com
Ethan Loh — Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
82match
heinsoe.com
Hein Soe | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
82match
obinnachidi.com
Obinna Chidi — Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
82match
andreafuso.dev
Andrea Fuso — Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
82match
isaxcode.com
Mohammed Isa — Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
81match
heyitsravi.com
Ravi Prakash — Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
81match
evanking.dev
Evan King | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
81match
sharmayash.com
Yash Sharma | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
81match
camipg.com
Camila Pozas — Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
81match
mohanedmetawea.com
Mohaned Metawea | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
81match
dirkdevelops.com
Dirk Knibbe — Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
81match
ricardosiebert.com
Ricardo Siebert — Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
80match
itshamzajaved.com
Hamza Javed | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
80match
itstarik.com
Tarik Hammoumi — Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
80match
connortabora.com
Connor Tabora | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
80match
gauravkumarkarki.com
Gaurav Kumar Karki - Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.