Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to amundsen.dev

Andreas Amundsen Portfolio · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
74match
andreasalvarsson.com
Andreas Alvarsson
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
70match
abosh.me
Andrew Abosh — Portfolio
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
70match
andresevaldez.com
Andres Valdez Portfolio
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
70match
devsofie.com
Portfolio
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
70match
devonbray.com
Portfolio
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
70match
andrewmcguckin.com
Andrew McGuckin - Portfolio
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
70match
kiannoctor.com
Kian's Portfolio
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
70match
pedrorfdez.com
Pedro Portfolio
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
70match
dev-shamim.com
Shamim Portfolio
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
70match
alexarraiza.dev
Alex's Portfolio
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
70match
anasalakkad.com
Anas Alakkad | Portfolio
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
70match
aryankashyap.com
Aryan's Portfolio
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
70match
amirabasyouni.com
Amira's Portfolio
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
70match
andriyoga.com
Andri Yoga | Portfolio
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
68match
devbychow.com
Alexander's Portfolio
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
68match
patrickjose.com
Patrick Jose Portfolio
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
68match
thanhorama.com
Thanh Tran | Portfolio
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
68match
alexarthur.me
Alex Arthur - Portfolio
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.