Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to amodhakal.tech

Amodh Dhakal · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
70match
alexlazcano.dev
Alex Lazcano
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
68match
angry-dev-thoughts.com
Angry dev thoughts - Software developers are sometimes angry
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
68match
rodrigobezerra.com
Rodrigo Bezerra - Software Developer
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
67match
arjunjuneja.com
arjun juneja
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
67match
greyblake.com
Posts | Serhii Potapov (greyblake)
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
66match
nhatcher.com
Nicolás Hatcher
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
66match
mateusguimaraes.com
Mateus Guimarães
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
66match
grumpyolddev.com
Grumpy Old Dev | Grumpy Old Dev
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
66match
kumarnetwork.com
hozan23
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
66match
matecdev.com
MatecDev | Mathematics, Technology, and Software Development
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
65match
agingdeveloper.net
The Aging Developer
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
65match
kylejeske.com
Bit by Bit | A blog about coding, technology, and software development.
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
65match
andrewlin.dev
Bork | Andrew Lin
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
65match
software-thoughts.com
Software Thoughts
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
64match
mauromeden.com
Mauro Meden
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
romangeber.com
Roman Geber
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
aaronlindsay.dev
Aaron Lindsay | Full-Stack Developer
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
64match
agilecoder.org
AgileCoder.net
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.