Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to ammarr.org

Ammar Rehan | Data Engineer · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
74match
horacelau.com
Horace Lau | Data Engineer
1 shared topicsdatabases
74match
ecekilikci.com
Ece Kilikci | Data Engineer
1 shared topicsdatabases
72match
acooke.dev
Aaron Cooke - Data Engineer
1 shared topicsdatabases
72match
acookie.dev
Aaron Cooke - Data Engineer
1 shared topicsdatabases
71match
bykevin.dev
Kevin Indra Mahendra | Data Engineer
1 shared topicsdatabases
71match
buildwithmiyazaki.dev
Yash Gupta — Data Engineer
1 shared topicsdatabases
71match
abhyudith.dev
Abhyudith M Bharadhwaj | Data Engineer
1 shared topicsdatabases
71match
juan-perea.dev
Juan Perea | Data Engineering Portfolio
1 shared topicsdatabases
70match
aldl.dev
Adriano Baviera — Data Engineer
1 shared topicsdatabases
70match
alejandromj.dev
Alejandro Martínez - Data Engineer
1 shared topicsdatabases
70match
ehara.dev
Ehara.dev | Data Engineering Notes & Articles
1 shared topicsdatabases
69match
mrdayter.com
Mr. Dayter — Data Engineer & Analyst
1 shared topicsdatabases
69match
athultr.com
Distributed – Software | Data Engineering | Databases
1 shared topicsdatabases
68match
byte-genie.cloud
ByteGenie | Fullstack data engineering agent
1 shared topicsdatabases
68match
mrtinsjoao.com
JV Martins | Data Architecture & Engineering
1 shared topicsdatabases
68match
bynarcomputing.com
Bynar Computing | Data & Application Engineering
1 shared topicsdatabases
68match
bynarcomputing.net
Bynar Computing | Data & Application Engineering
1 shared topicsdatabases
68match
pablomopa.com
Pablo M. - Data Science & Engineering
1 shared topicsdatabases

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.