Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to ammadden.com

A.M. Madden | Romance Writer | USA Today Bestselling Author · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
72match
amyleabooks.com
Bestselling Author | Amy Lea
1 shared topicsromance
72match
kindlealexander.com
Kindle Alexander | MM Romance Author & Bestselling Books
1 shared topicsromance
71match
charismichaels.com
Charis Michaels | Romance Author
1 shared topicsromance
70match
sinnerjames.com
Sinner James Romance Writer | Sinner James Author
1 shared topicsromance
70match
patriciajohns.com
Patricia Johns – Bestselling author
1 shared topicsromance
70match
desireespan.com
DESIREE SPAN | Romance books
1 shared topicsromance
69match
charliegodwyne.com
Charlie Godwyne | Romance Author
1 shared topicsromance
69match
abrapressler.com
Abra Pressler | Romance Author
1 shared topicsromance
69match
andisix.com
Andi Six | Romance Author
1 shared topicsromance
69match
naiamoray.com
Naia Maray Romance Author
1 shared topicsromance
68match
anaashley.com
Ana Ashley | Romance Author
1 shared topicsromance
68match
amyalvesbooks.com
Amy Alves | Romance Author
1 shared topicsromance
68match
teriturcotteauthor.com
TeriTurcotteAuthor – Romance Writing
1 shared topicsromance
68match
kimhatch.com
Kimberley Hatch | Romance & Young Adult Author
1 shared topicsromance
68match
charlotteannebooks.com
Charlotte Anne | Regency Romance Author
1 shared topicsromance
68match
cheryllaneauthor.com
Cheryl R. Lane, Romance Author
1 shared topicsromance
67match
anakirkshaw.com
Ana Kirk Shaw - Romance Author
1 shared topicsromance
67match
beverlyovalleauthor.com
Happily Ever After One Book at a Time www.beverlyovalleauthor.com | Romance Writer
1 shared topicsromance

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.