Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to amisikevin.com

Amisi Kevin · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
62match
andynguyenpdx.com
Andy Nguyen's Portfolio
3 shared topicsdesign
62match
3osman.com
Engineering The Design – Interdisciplinary human-computer interaction and design thoughts from a grad student
3 shared topicsdesign
62match
adamkimmerer.com
Adam Kimmerer
3 shared topicsdesign
62match
andybuildsdifferent.dev
ABD | Design That Slaps
3 shared topicsdesign
47match
hisazzad.com
Sazzad Hossain – Crafting Product & UX Experiences
2 shared topicsdesign
47match
burnified.com
Mark Johnson - Product & UI Designer
2 shared topicsdesign
46match
holaliz.com
Lizbeth Martinez - UX & Product Designer | Portfolio & Case Studies
2 shared topicsdesign
46match
lorenzoguardati.com
Lorenzo Guardati - Product Designer
2 shared topicsdesign
46match
createwithsosa.com
Javier Sosa – UX & Graphic Designer Portfolio
2 shared topicsdesign
46match
atariajohnson.com
Ataria Johnson's Portfolio
2 shared topicsdesign
46match
regancreative.com
Regan Creative | Digital Consultancy
2 shared topicsdesign
46match
adaorawilliams.com
Adaora Williams | Product Designer
2 shared topicsdesign
46match
refikacimen.com
Refika Cimen - UX Designer | Product Design & UX Research
2 shared topicsdesign
46match
gabepuckett.com
Gabe Puckett | Visual & Product Designer
2 shared topicsdesign
45match
adammldesign.com
AdamML Design
2 shared topicsdesign
45match
eboecking.com
Evan Boecking | UX/UI Designer
2 shared topicsdesign
45match
andrewbarchuk.com
Andrew Barchuk — Creative Developer
2 shared topicsdesign
45match
aaronct.me
Aaron C-T — Digital Product Designer
2 shared topicsdesign

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.