Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to amirdev.info

AmirDev - Full-Stack Developer · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
80match
3dots.io
Luke Bogacz | Full-Stack Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
80match
silke.dev
Silke - Full-Stack Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
79match
thadbloom.com
Thad Bloom - Full-stack web developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
79match
justindasilva.com
Justin Da Silva - Full-Stack Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
79match
louisadriano.com
Louis Adriano - Full-stack Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
78match
buildwithatul.dev
Atul | Full-Stack Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
78match
4dmu.dev
4Dmu — Full-Stack Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
78match
reediktuuling.com
Reedik Tuuling - Full-stack developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
78match
1ceit.com
iceit - Fullstack Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
78match
buildwithkode.com
Karthik — Full-Stack Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
78match
ozurek.com
Oz Urek - Full-Stack Web Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
78match
hiteshranaut.com
Hitesh -full-stack Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
78match
jrcode.dev
Javi Rodriguez - Full-stack developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
78match
mrfdev.com
Full Stack Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
78match
hoangfin.com
Hoang Tran - Full-Stack Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
78match
muhamedmuhamedagic.com
Muhamed Muhamedagic - Full-Stack Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
77match
eevloeev.dev
Aslan Evloev — Full-Stack Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
77match
anggita.org
Joseph Joshua Anggita | Full-stack developer
1 shared topicsweb-development

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.