Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to amirbitran.com

Amir Bitran: Scientist and Composer - Home · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
70match
asdas.org
ASSOCIATION SDA SCIENTISTS - Home
1 shared topicsscience
68match
artofsciencewebdesign.com
Websites for Scientists and Artists
1 shared topicsscience
67match
askascientistsf.com
Ask a Scientist lecture series
1 shared topicsscience
67match
aaa-scientists.com
AAA Scientists
1 shared topicsscience
67match
bigscienceuk.com
Big Science - Home
1 shared topicsscience
66match
nakedscientist.com
Naked Scientists Online, Science Podcast and Science Radio Show
1 shared topicsscience
66match
pathsight.com
PathSight Predictive Science - Home
1 shared topicsscience
66match
ayork.net
Alxandr Kane York | Data and Neuroscientist
1 shared topicsscience
66match
simonscientific.com
Simon Scientific
1 shared topicsscience
66match
ascientistwalksintoabar.net
Home - A Scientist Walks into a Bar
1 shared topicsscience
66match
labtech.co.uk 🇬🇧
Serving Scientists - Labtech
1 shared topicsscience
66match
kindnessinscience.com
Kindness in Science | Kind Scientists
1 shared topicsscience
66match
arsic.org
Art Researches Science - Home
1 shared topicsscience
66match
annabelanyang.com
Annabel Anyang: Scientist and Visual Storyteller Portfolio | Annabel Anyang – Scientist x Storyteller
1 shared topicsscience
66match
aysfellowship.org
Asian Young Scientist Fellowship
1 shared topicsscience
66match
namscience.com
Namibia Scientific Society
1 shared topicsscience
66match
renatobraghiere.com
Dr. Renato K. Braghiere | Research Scientist
1 shared topicsscience
66match
andlab-um.com
AND Lab - Home
1 shared topicsscience

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.