similar sites

‹ Profile AI Report Tools

Sites similar to ambermitchellbooks.com

Amber Mitchell – YA Author · ranked by shared content topics & relevance

dlleeauthor.com

D.L. Lee – Author

2 shared topicsfiction

nfwebbbooks.com

N.F.Webb – Author

2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

R.L. Meza – Author

2 shared topicsfiction

Rob Queen – Author

2 shared topicsfiction

theladyandariel.com

The Lady Andariel – Author

2 shared topicsfiction

ashlenbrown.com

Ashlen Brown – Author

2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

pippasteele.com

Pippa Steele – Author

2 shared topicsfiction

benjamincrow.com

Benjamin Crow – Author

2 shared topicsfiction

R.M. Allinson – Author

2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

Greg Prado – Book Author

2 shared topicsfiction

alariccabiling.net

ALARIC CABILING's OFFICIAL SITE – AUTHOR

2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

Robin Reul | Author

2 shared topicsfiction

a.r.mckinnon | Author

2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

maudemartin.com

Maude Martin - Author

2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

benjaminkelly.net

Benjamin Kelly.net – Author blog

2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

abbiewoodbridgeauthor.com

Abbie Woodbridge Author

2 shared topicsfiction

ariaorchard.com

Author Aria Orchard – American Author

2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

anniedonwerth-chikamatsu.com

Annie Donwerth-Chikamatsu | Author

2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.