Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to amazon.software

Amazon Developers · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
79match
9dev.tech
9 Developers
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
79match
9developers.tech
9 Developers
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
77match
newos.dev
newOS for Developers
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
76match
bmrdevelopers.com
BMR Developers
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
75match
bobbydeveloper.com
Bobby developer
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
75match
1percent.dev
1% Developer
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
74match
somali.dev
Somali Developers
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
74match
angrydeveloper.org
Angry developer
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
73match
invisiondevs.com
Forums - Invision Developers
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
72match
fcdevs.com
Full Cycle Developers
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
72match
androidkotlinexperience.com
Home - Android Kotlin Developers
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
72match
thenewdevelopers.com
Home | The New Developers
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
72match
matiasvad.com
Matias Vad - Developer
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
72match
kshivam.com
Developer Stack
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
72match
iosdeveloperguy.com
iOSDeveloperGuy
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
71match
newteethglendale.com
TOTH Developer Index
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
71match
newteethphoenix.com
TOTH Developer Index
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
71match
newteethmesa.com
TOTH Developer Index
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.