Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to amactive.net

amactive 2022 | FE Developer · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
72match
robhoover.dev
Rob Hoover | Web Developer
2 shared topicsweb-development
70match
bmeen.dev
bMeen | Frontend Developer
2 shared topicsweb-development
70match
thestovelives.com
Jacob Stovall - Software Developer
2 shared topicsweb-development
70match
agustinlopezdev.com
Agustin Lopez Developer
2 shared topicsweb-development
70match
rokaswebdev.com
Full stack web developer - Homepage
2 shared topicsweb-development
70match
2brothers.io
2 Brothers: React Native Development
2 shared topicsweb-development
69match
arranjames.io
Arran James - Full Stack Web Developer
2 shared topicsweb-development
69match
sondayip.com
Sonda Yip | Front-End Developer
2 shared topicsweb-development
69match
armunir.com
Ahmad Raza - Full Stack Developer
2 shared topicsweb-development
69match
dmoffat.com
Daniel Moffat | Developer
2 shared topicsweb-development
69match
bokorarmin.com
Bokor Ármin - Software Developer
2 shared topicsweb-development
69match
berck.io
Berckan Guerrero - Full Stack Developer
2 shared topicsweb-development
69match
nicholasmajeski.com
NM | Software Developer
2 shared topicsweb-development
69match
alfarhanzahedi.tech
Alfarhan Zahedi | Full-Stack Developer
2 shared topicsweb-development
69match
adrianperez.me
Adrian Perez - CRM Developer
2 shared topicsweb-development
69match
sohamkolte.dev
Soham Kolte | Full-Stack Developer Portfolio
2 shared topicsweb-development
68match
billsearle.me
Bill Searle - Senior Front End Web Developer
2 shared topicsweb-development
68match
maxgamerov.com
Max Gamero V - Flutter/Dart Mobile developer - Resume
2 shared topicsweb-development

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.