similar sites

Browse

AI Report Tools

Sites similar to allforlab.de

Allforlab alternatives & similar sites

DaihanSci - Daihan Scientific — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Science →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
ag-openscience.de ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	AG Open Science -	Germany de	science WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
buergeruni.com ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Buergeruni: Perestroika in Science!	de	science	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
fem4science.com ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	fem4science	de	science WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
cs-communication.org ↗	62 match 1 shared topics	Startseite - CS Science Communication GmbH	de	science WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
experimenta.science ↗	62 match 1 shared topics	experimenta \| Deutschlands größtes Science Center	de	science WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
3rund.de ↗	62 match 1 shared topics	3rund – at the intersection between science, research and social fields of practice	Germany de	science WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
bernstein-network.de ↗	61 match 1 shared topics	Home – Bernstein Netzwerk Computational Neuroscience	Germany de	science WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
hrstraub.net ↗	61 match 1 shared topics	Startseite - Hansruedi Straub	de	science WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
entdeckum-kinderlabor.com ↗	61 match 1 shared topics	ENTDECKUM - das Labor für Kinder - ENTDECKUM - das Labor für Kinder	de	science WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
antiquonauts.com ↗	61 match 1 shared topics	Antiquonauts.com \| Alles über Prä-Astronautik, Ancient Aliens, Paläo-SETI	de	science WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
stem-fatale.com ↗	61 match 1 shared topics	STEM fatale – Science – S – Survey Technology – T – Transformation Engineering – E – Exchange / Experience Mathematics – M – Mentoring	de	science WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
factitiousdaily.com ↗	61 match 1 shared topics	The Factitious Daily – Ein Forschungsprojekt	de	science WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
deuqua.net ↗	61 match 1 shared topics	Deutsche Quartärvereinigung - Deutsche Quartärvereinigung e.V.	de	science Jimdo	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
deuqua.org ↗	61 match 1 shared topics	Deutsche Quartärvereinigung - Deutsche Quartärvereinigung e.V.	de	science Jimdo	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
open-roberta.com ↗	60 match 1 shared topics	Open Roberta \| Ein Projekt der Roberta-Initiative des Fraunhofer IAIS	de	science WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
openroberta.com ↗	60 match 1 shared topics	Open Roberta \| Ein Projekt der Roberta-Initiative des Fraunhofer IAIS	de	science WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
volt-phase.com ↗	60 match 1 shared topics	VoltPhase Wissen – Faszinierende Fakten aus Raum, Technik, Erfindungen und Biologie	de	science	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
elemente.org ↗	60 match 1 shared topics	eLeMeNTe e.V. – Landesverein Sachsen-Anhalt zur Förderung mathematisch, naturwissenschaftlich und technisch interessierter und talentierter Schülerinnen, Schüler und Studierender	de	science WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.