Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to allanbathurst.org

Allan Bathurst - Design Leadership · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
100match
allanbathurst.net
Allan Bathurst - Design Leadership
2 shared topicsdesign
73match
mattgouldportfolio.com
Matt Gould Portfolio — Product Design & Design Leadership
2 shared topicsdesign
71match
kubec.com
Jan Kubec - Design Lead
2 shared topicsdesign
70match
2em-creative.com
Soumya Nagesh :: Design Leader
2 shared topicsdesign
69match
pkarolak.com
Patrik Karolak // Design. Leadership.
2 shared topicsdesign
69match
griffithsweb.com
Neil Griffiths Design Portfolio
2 shared topicsdesign
68match
robborja.com
Rob Borja — Designer, Leader, Mentor
2 shared topicsdesign
68match
dixonbordiano.com
Dixon Bordiano - Creative and Product Design Leader
2 shared topicsdesign
67match
krissixenakis.com
Krissi Xenakis Design
2 shared topicsdesign
66match
matthewreiswig.com
Home - Do. Disrupt. Lead.
2 shared topicsdesign
65match
andrewslifkin.com
Andrew Slifkin | Design Manager
2 shared topicsdesign
65match
mathisworks.com
Mike Mathis, Principal Product Designer
2 shared topicsdesign
65match
rohan-verma.com
Rohan Verma | Design + Product Leader | Driving Growth, Revenue & Intelligence with Craft and Scale
2 shared topicsdesign
65match
fbacadesign.com
Home | Frances Baca Design
2 shared topicsdesign
64match
kristinalemasson.com
Kristina Lemasson | Product Design & Development Leader in Montreal Canada
2 shared topicsdesign
64match
sojinrank.com
Sojin Rank * Director of Brand + Design
2 shared topicsdesign
64match
mattheweisenberg.com
Matthew Eisenberg UX Designer
2 shared topicsdesign
63match
matiasux.com
Matias Rodriguez — Head of Design
2 shared topicsdesign

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.