Piperic Business Intelligence
similar sites
‹ profile

Sites similar to alkangar.com

Al Kangar · ranked by category · tech stack · backlink co-citation
85match
alkhabia.com
Al-khabia
3 co-citations5 shared tech1 shared categoryshopping
79match
juliachocolatekw.com
julia chocolate
3 co-citations4 shared tech1 shared categoryshopping
67match
mandialamir.com
Mandi alamir
2 co-citations4 shared tech1 shared categoryshopping
67match
elevenboutiquekw.com
Eleven Boutique
2 co-citations4 shared tech1 shared categoryshopping
67match
fenneckwt.com
Fennec
2 co-citations4 shared tech1 shared categoryshopping
62match
dhafikw.com
ضافي
2 co-citations4 shared tech1 shared categoryshopping
61match
bank-alkahraman.com
Bank Alkahraman
2 co-citations3 shared tech1 shared categoryshopping
58match
3trevo.com
الرئيسية | TREVO Fragrances
2 co-citations3 shared tech1 shared categoryshopping
53match
afiameat.com
لحوم عافية
2 co-citations5 shared tech0 shared categorygrocery-shopping
53match
bazstore1.com
Baz Store
1 co-citations4 shared tech1 shared categoryshopping
52match
gulfamateurs.com
مسابيح هدايا هواة الخليج
2 co-citations4 shared tech1 shared categoryshopping
50match
baitii.com
Baitii
1 co-citations3 shared tech1 shared categoryshopping
50match
boordqakw.com
Boordqa
1 co-citations3 shared tech1 shared categoryshopping
49match
centikw.com
Centi
2 co-citations2 shared tech1 shared categoryshopping
49match
jiokw.com
JIO
2 co-citations2 shared tech1 shared categoryshopping
48match
japanesesip.com
رشفة يابانية Japanese Sip
2 co-citations1 shared tech1 shared categoryshopping
48match
jazboutiqu.com
جاز بوتيك 🐆
2 co-citations1 shared tech1 shared categoryshopping
48match
24k-store.com
24 قيراط للعبايات
2 co-citations1 shared tech1 shared categoryshopping

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.