Piperic Business Intelligence
similar sites
‹ profile

Sites similar to aliviafleur.com

Alivia Fleur · ranked by category · tech stack · backlink co-citation
69match
corayoungbooks.com
Cora Young
6 co-citations8 shared tech1 shared categoryromance
66match
breeharlow.com
Bree Harlow
5 co-citations8 shared tech1 shared categoryromance
65match
maisondeloup.com
Maison De Loup
5 co-citations8 shared tech1 shared categoryromance
64match
jillyharrisonauthor.com
Jilly Harrison
5 co-citations8 shared tech1 shared categoryromance
64match
coracraneauthor.com
Cora Crane
5 co-citations8 shared tech1 shared categoryromance
64match
fiddakabir.com
Fidda Kabir
5 co-citations8 shared tech1 shared categoryromance
63match
ivyflamebooks.com
Ivy Flame
4 co-citations8 shared tech1 shared categoryromance
63match
elishalark.com
Elisha Lark
4 co-citations8 shared tech1 shared categoryromance
63match
marenvanessen.com
Maren van Essen
4 co-citations8 shared tech1 shared categoryromance
63match
margotmoonbooks.com
Margot Moon
4 co-citations8 shared tech1 shared categoryromance
62match
joesatoria.com
Joe Satoria │ MM Romance Author
5 co-citations8 shared tech1 shared categoryromance
62match
mandiraynes.com
Mandi Raynes
5 co-citations8 shared tech1 shared categoryromance
62match
dhrenfroe.com
DH Renfroe
5 co-citations8 shared tech1 shared categoryromance
62match
elamypride.com
Elamy Pride
5 co-citations8 shared tech1 shared categoryromance
62match
maisymagill.com
Maisy Magill
6 co-citations8 shared tech1 shared categoryromance
62match
jennayoungromance.com
Jenna Young
4 co-citations8 shared tech1 shared categoryromance
62match
janetvarityauthor.com
Janet Varity
4 co-citations8 shared tech1 shared categoryromance
62match
hanameadows.com
Hana Meadows
5 co-citations8 shared tech1 shared categoryromance

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.