Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to alexpagnotta.dev

Alex Pagnotta · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
71match
alexpearce.me
Alex Pearwin
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
70match
maxgirkins.com
Max Girkins
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
69match
alexforsyth.io
Alex Forsyth
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
69match
a16n.dev
Alex Nicholson
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
68match
pjkumlue.com
PJ KUMLUE
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
68match
piceno.dev
Piceno
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
68match
alexding.me
Alex Ding
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
68match
matejaksa.com
Máté Jaksa - Software Developer
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
68match
softwaresorcery.co.uk 🇬🇧
Software Sorcery Home
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
68match
alexsh.me
Alex Hollander - Home
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
68match
mattolenik.com
software engineer | matthew olenik
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
68match
gtmnayan.com
Home | Nayan Gautam
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
68match
softwarebypaul.com
Software by Paul
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
67match
piromancy.com
The PIROmancy blog - All about our software developer journey
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
67match
bmtmicro-info.com
BMT Micro Customer Service
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
67match
pikhota.com
Serhii Pikhota
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
67match
rockbridgesoftware.com
Rockbridge Software
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
66match
blueappstechnology.com
Blueapps Technology – Software development & deployment
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.