Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to alexlazcano.dev

Alex Lazcano · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
70match
alexmccartney.com
Alex McCartney
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
70match
alexhadley.net
Alex Hadley
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
69match
rodrigobezerra.com
Rodrigo Bezerra - Software Developer
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
69match
arjunjuneja.com
arjun juneja
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
69match
angry-dev-thoughts.com
Angry dev thoughts - Software developers are sometimes angry
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
68match
greyblake.com
Posts | Serhii Potapov (greyblake)
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
68match
nhatcher.com
Nicolás Hatcher
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
68match
alexmic.net
Alex Michael
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
68match
alexlewtschuk.com
Alex Lewtschuk
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
67match
mateusguimaraes.com
Mateus Guimarães
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
67match
grumpyolddev.com
Grumpy Old Dev | Grumpy Old Dev
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
66match
aaronlindsay.dev
Aaron Lindsay | Full-Stack Developer
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
66match
matecdev.com
MatecDev | Mathematics, Technology, and Software Development
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
66match
kumarnetwork.com
hozan23
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
66match
alexyoung.org
Alex Young
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
66match
benjaminbrandt.com
Ben Brandt
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
66match
benwc.dev
Ben Warwick-Champion
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
66match
ariannastory.com
Arianna Story
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.