Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to alexitaylor.dev

Home | Alexi Taylor · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
69match
bentaylor.dev
Ben Taylor
3 shared topicsprogramming-languages
68match
aroble.com
Home | Roble
3 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
67match
matijacvetan.com
Matija Cvetan | Software Developer
3 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
67match
mateisr.com
Home | mateisr.com
3 shared topicsprogramming-languages
66match
allison-truhlar.com
Allison Truhlar's Portfolio
3 shared topicsweb-development
66match
allypost.net
Home | josip.igr.ec
3 shared topicsprogramming-languages
66match
kruceblake.com
home - kruce blake
3 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
66match
kruceb.com
home - kruce blake
3 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
66match
robertsmieja.com
Home | Robert Smieja
3 shared topicsprogramming-languages
66match
aayushksharma.com
Yush — Software Engineer
3 shared topicsprogramming-languages
65match
mathaushuber.com
Mathaus Huber — Software Engineer
3 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
65match
cmgcode.com
Campbell Gorman — Software Engineer
3 shared topicsweb-development
65match
abdulkhalek.dev
Abdulkhalek Muhammad | Full-Stack Engineer
3 shared topicsweb-development
65match
arpy8.com
Arpit Sengar | Home
3 shared topicsweb-development
65match
0xjcf.com
Jose Flores | Statecharts & Actor Model in TypeScript | Writing & Open Source
3 shared topicsprogramming-languages
65match
boberle.com
Bruno Oberle - Software Engineer
3 shared topicsprogramming-languages
65match
neuralphantom.com
Ali Tarakzai
3 shared topicsweb-development
65match
somstack.com
Home
3 shared topicsweb-development

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.