Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to aleksandrs.dev

Aleksandrs Savkins | aleksandrs.dev · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
69match
aleksac.me
About | Aleksa Cukovic
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
67match
bal.al
Aleksandar Balalovski - About Me
2 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
65match
andrewwigman.com
Andrew Wigman
2 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
65match
timbytes.dev
Tim Bytes
2 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
64match
roberttravispierce.com
Home - Robert Travis Pierce
2 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
64match
ronmuehlhaus.com
Ron Mühlhaus | Portfolio
2 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
64match
krismuniz.com
Kristian Muñiz
2 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
64match
alencar.tech
Home | Alencar Tech
2 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
64match
arindammajumder.com
Arindam Majumder
2 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
64match
balbas.io
Philip Balbas | Software Developer
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
thenammai.com
Nam Mai
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
63match
andrewaxelrod.dev
Andrew Axelrod
2 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
63match
doltechlabs.com
Dol Tech Labs | Automating the Future
2 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
63match
thetechvanta.com
Techvanta — AI Tools Reviews & Guides 2026 | Alex Mercer
2 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
63match
billx.dev
Bill X · billx.dev
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
63match
soferdani.com
Dani Sofer
2 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
63match
softwaresammy.com
Samantha Orciuoli - Software engineer, developer, and student
2 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
63match
ai-a.dev
The AI-Augmented Developer Manifesto | ai-a.dev
2 shared topicsartificial-intelligence

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.