Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to alecschmidt.com

Alec Schmidt — Product Designer · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
71match
andrewpennell.com
Andrew Pennell — Product & Systems Designer
2 shared topicsdesign
71match
romanbudzak.com
Product Design Portfolio
2 shared topicsdesign
69match
ping-portfolio.com
Ping - Sr.Product Design Portfolio
2 shared topicsdesign
67match
kylerblue.com
Kyler Blue — Designer & Builder
2 shared topicsdesign
66match
kushagradhawan.com
Kushagra Dhawan | Independent Product & Design Consultant
2 shared topicsdesign
65match
maximepski.com
Maxime Podgorski — Design Engineer
2 shared topicsdesign
64match
nexerdigital.com
We design digital products and services that help people live and work better - Nexer Digital
2 shared topicsdesign
63match
alexzandi.me
Alex Z・Design Engineer
2 shared topicsdesign
62match
robbradlee.com
Rob Bradlee | Portfolio – User Experience, Design Leadership, Problem Solving, Storytelling
2 shared topicsdesign
62match
mbdsconsulting.com
Model-Based Design - Examining the technical and social aspects of Model-Based Design
2 shared topicsdesign
60match
gudhakesa.com
Gudhakesa
2 shared topicsdesign
60match
mattfelten.com
Matt Felten
2 shared topicsdesign
60match
roelstein.com
Roel Stein
2 shared topicsdesign
60match
thelogchain-domain.com
LogChain
2 shared topicsdesign
59match
bilalxdesign.com
Bilal - Product Designer
1 shared topicsdesign
56match
ipreferstephen.com
Stephen Schaller – Product Designer
1 shared topicsdesign
55match
matthewaoconnor.com
Matt O'Connor | UX & Product Design
1 shared topicsdesign
52match
mbproduct.com
Michael Bilderbach - Product Designer
1 shared topicsdesign

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.