Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to aldodev.org

Aldo Lucchetta - Portfolio · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
75match
mattsibson.com
Matt Sibson - Portfolio
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
74match
piersrajguru.com
Piers Rajguru - Portfolio
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
73match
soorajk1.com
Sooraj's Portfolio
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
73match
andrewmcguckin.com
Andrew McGuckin - Portfolio
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
73match
arnav-sethi.com
Arnav Sethi | Portfolio
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
73match
kyleblee.com
Kyle Lee - Portfolio
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
73match
kumarashish.com
Ashish Kumar | Portfolio
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
72match
krisjulio.dev
Kris - Portfolio
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
72match
robertpopeii.com
Robert Pope II | Portfolio
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
72match
rolzie.com
Rolzie - Portfolio
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
71match
gretelarcia.com
Gretel Arcia - Portfolio
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
71match
felipeparrac.com
Felipe Parra | Mathematician Portfolio
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
71match
alexmccairel.dev
Alex McCairel | Portfolio
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
70match
alexarthur.me
Alex Arthur - Portfolio
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
70match
aidensanders.dev
Portfolio | Aiden Sanders
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
70match
fbence.com
Bence Farkas | Portfolio
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
70match
arslanbekzhaparov.com
Arslan's Portfolio
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
70match
nibardo.com
Portfolio
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.