Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to alansalazar.dev

Alan Salazar | AI Engineer · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
77match
afrahm.tech
Afrah M | AI Engineer
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
77match
anshprasad.dev
Ansh Kumar | AI Engineer
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
75match
abhishekgupta.dev
Abhishek Gupta | AI Engineer
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
75match
kumailhaider.com
Kumail Haider | AI Engineer
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
75match
ansart.dev
Alex Ansart | AI Engineer
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
75match
kumarkarthikan.com
Kumar Karthik | AI Engineer
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
75match
dolenko.com
DOLENKO — AI Engineering
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
75match
maxcoto.com
Max Coto - AI Engineer
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
74match
abhi-shek.dev
Abhishek Kumar | AI Systems Engineer
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
74match
adamamzar.my
Adam Amzar | Full Stack AI Engineer
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
74match
arnavvyas.com
Arnav Vyas | Applied AI Engineer
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
73match
ashouri.me
Nick Ashouri | AI & LLM Engineer
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
73match
matthouse.dev
Matt House — AI Engineer
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
73match
alexjensen.me
Alex Jensen — AI Engineer
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
73match
arpan-nookala.com
Arpan Nookala — AI Engineer
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
73match
faranz.com
Faran Zafar | AI/ML Engineer
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
73match
ahmedbilal.org
Ahmed Bilal — AI Engineer
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
73match
adarsh-s.tech
Adarsh S — AI Engineer
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.