Piperic
similar sites
‹ profile

Sites similar to alankrit.dev

Alankrit Khatri — Developer and Builder · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
72match
doriangironde.com
Dorian Gironde — Developer & Builder
1 shared topicsweb-development
70match
meeliang.com
Aero — Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
70match
alexinfanti.com
Alex Infanti — Full-Stack Developer & Builder
1 shared topicsweb-development
70match
nipunnirmana.com
Nipun Nirmana — Developer, Engineer & Builder
1 shared topicsweb-development
69match
nigeldev.com
Nigel Davies — Web Developer & SaaS Builder
1 shared topicsweb-development
69match
r-tae.dev
River Tae Smith — Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
69match
alaataieb.com
Alaa Taieb — Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
69match
annetrent.dev
Anne Trent — Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
69match
nipeno.dev
Nipeno — Developer Portfolio
1 shared topicsweb-development
69match
alexlee.app
Alex Lee — Developer Portfolio
1 shared topicsweb-development
69match
iphil.dev
Isla Philipp — Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
69match
antoniovillanacci.com
Antonio Villanacci — Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
69match
meghbadonia.com
Megh Badonia — Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
69match
rodrigocmendes.com
Rodrigo Mendes — Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
68match
leoericson.com
Leo Ericson — Developer & SysAdmin
1 shared topicsweb-development
68match
c2tbuilds.com
C2T Builds | Developer Portfolio
1 shared topicsweb-development
68match
developerachem.com
Developer Achem
1 shared topicsweb-development
68match
developerlanka.com
Home | Developer Lanka
1 shared topicsweb-development

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.