Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to alangabriel.dev

Alan Gabriel · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
60match
pescador.dev
@dev.pescador | Links
3 shared topicsweb-development
60match
riguetto.dev
Eduardo Riguetto
3 shared topicsweb-development
60match
singlecode.pt 🇵🇹
SingleCode
3 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
41match
phasscode.com
Phass Code
2 shared topicsweb-development
41match
alexandre-tortoza.tech
Alexandre Tortoza — Programador
2 shared topicsweb-development
40match
bellesamways.com
Isabelle Samways
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
40match
bellesamways.dev
Isabelle Samways
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
40match
alexsonluna.dev
Alexson Luna | Desenvolvedor Backend Java
2 shared topicsweb-development
40match
angelodallecrode.dev
Angelo Dallecrode Portfolio
2 shared topicsweb-development
40match
tokenengineeringlab.com
[T] Token Engineering Lab — Claude Code Engineering Guide
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
40match
4devstools.com
4DevsTools — Developers' Tools
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
40match
krdevs.com
Christian de Andrade | Software Engineer
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
40match
marlonsavian.com
Marlon Savian: Software Engineer
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
40match
nerdicas.com
@nerdicas - Let's build stuff
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
40match
theochaguri.com
Redirecionadorwhats - Theo Chaguri
2 shared topicsweb-development
40match
compose.pt 🇵🇹
Olá mundo!
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
40match
soloweb.pt 🇵🇹
• Solo
2 shared topicsweb-development
30match
alexribeiro.io
Alex Ribeiro
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.