similar sites

Sites similar to alanatchison.com

Alan Atchison | Author · ranked by shared content topics & relevance

philipfriedmanauthor.com

Philip Friedman | Author

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

philipchasebooks.com

Philip Friedman | Author

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

pamelakknudsen.com

Pamela K. Knudsen - AuthorPamela K. Knudsen | Author

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

A.V. Geiger – Author

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

Eric Holmes – author

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

byjamiehoward.com

Jamie howard – Author

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

denisemahaneyauthor.com

Denise Mahaney – Author

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

denelecampbell.com

denelecampbell – Author

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

sanjakulenovic.com

Sanja Kulenovic – Author

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

kayalineturner.com

Kay Aline Turner – Author

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

sarajanetriglia.com

Sara Jane Triglia – Author

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

saratriglia.com

Sara Jane Triglia – Author

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

pedrogunnlaugur.com

Pedro Gunnlaugur Garcia – Author

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

samanthaseiple.com

Samantha Seiple

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

erinlitteken.com

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

iainmaclachlainn.com

Iain Mac Lachlainn – Author Site

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.