Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to alanamandel.com

Alana Mandel | Creative Director & Designer · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
78match
anuncommonname.com
Jen Cook Creative Director & Designer
1 shared topicsdesign
77match
calebkroemer.com
Caleb Kroemer | Creative Director & Designer
1 shared topicsdesign
76match
antoniomoton.com
AM II Designer & Creative Director
1 shared topicsdesign
76match
aoujasvi.com
Aoujasvi | Creative Director & Product Designer
1 shared topicsdesign
75match
batuhanvardarli.com
Batuhan Vardarlı — Creative Director & Designer
1 shared topicsdesign
75match
anikjain.com
Anik Jain - Creative Director & Brand Designer
1 shared topicsdesign
75match
annamagni.com
Anna Magni — Creative Director and Designer
1 shared topicsdesign
74match
anniebelgrade.com
Home | Creative Director
1 shared topicsdesign
74match
studio-ly.co.uk 🇬🇧
Mike Lythgoe / Creative Director / Designer
1 shared topicsdesign
74match
madebycs.com
Conner Smith - Creative Director & Product Designer
1 shared topicsdesign
74match
heyjameslopez.com
Jaime Lopez | Creative Direction & Design
1 shared topicsdesign
74match
rickhoyle.com
Rick Hoyle | Creative Director & UX/UI Design Leader
1 shared topicsdesign
73match
andrewcapelli.com
Andrew Capelli - Designer & Creative Director
1 shared topicsdesign
73match
dimkeaton.com
Dim — Designer, Artist & Creative Director
1 shared topicsdesign
73match
anjalimenondesign.com
Anjali Menon | Creative Direction & Design
1 shared topicsdesign
73match
gcvideoportfolio.com
GC Creative Director
1 shared topicsdesign
73match
gccreativedirector.com
GC Creative Director
1 shared topicsdesign
73match
hellokevinli.com
Kevin Li | Creative Director
1 shared topicsdesign

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.