Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to akhansari.tech

Amin Khansari's Notes · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
66match
arpitjn.com
Arpit J | Notes
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
65match
benjaminward.com
Benjamin Ward
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
64match
benjaminbthompson.com
Benjamin Thompson
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
64match
rockiespetsupply.com
James Gray — Simple code for complex problems
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
ben-xu.dev
Benjamin Xu
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
64match
benchanjamin.com
Benjamin Chan
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
benjack.io
Benjamin R. Jack
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
benjaminstrick.com
Home - Benjamin Strick
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
63match
benjamin-desmet.com
Benjamin Desmet
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
63match
benjaminschott.com
Benjamin Schott
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
63match
blueprintforge.com
Blueprint Forge.
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
63match
benjamincarlson.io
Home – Benjamin Carlson
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
63match
anydata.uk 🇬🇧
Fred Youhanaie | Blog posts and project notes.
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
63match
anydata.co.uk 🇬🇧
Fred Youhanaie | Blog posts and project notes.
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
63match
benblanquart.com
Benjamin Blanquart
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
63match
pitayan.com
Pitayan Blog
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
63match
5error.com
5 Error | Software, stories, and the world they're built in.
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
63match
inspyration.com
Dr. Leif Singer
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.