Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to ajmck.dev

AJ McKenna | Developer Portfolio · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
77match
alastairgrant.dev
Alastair Grant - Developer Portfolio
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
76match
maurice3.com
Maurice3 | Interactive Developer Portfolio
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
74match
fdraye.com
My Portfolio
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
74match
maxxtang.com
Max Tang — Portfolio
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
73match
rosasuviranta.com
Research Portfolio
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
73match
kuganraj29.com
My Tech Portfolio
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
72match
krishvig.com
Cloud & AI Engineer Portfolio
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
72match
dkapur.com
Dhruv Kapur | Portfolio
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
72match
fataniazi.com
Fata | Portfolio
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
71match
alex-zc.me
portfolio
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
71match
kristianelmer.com
Kristian Elmer - Portfolio
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
71match
ahmedbouzid.dev
Ahmed Bouzid - Data Engineer Portfolio
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
71match
ashokraja.tech
Ashok A | Portfolio
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
71match
kyungsub.com
LKS Portfolio
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
71match
rohitsurya.dev
Rohit Surya A T - Portfolio
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
71match
softprince.dev
Royal Singh - Full Stack & AI/ML Developer | Portfolio
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
71match
100aiprojects.dev
100 AI Projects - AI Development Portfolio
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
71match
anoopkarnik.net
Portfolio
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.