Piperic
similar sites
‹ profile

Sites similar to ajmann.com

A.J. Mann | Romance and SFF Author · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
80match
anyajayvyn.com
Anya Jayvyn | Romance Author
2 shared topicsromance
79match
sophieloveauthor.com
Sophie Love | Romance author
2 shared topicsromance
76match
rubybeaumont.com
Ruby Beaumont – Romance Author
2 shared topicsromance
75match
pipdolyn.com
Pip Dolyn – Queer Romance Author
2 shared topicsromance
75match
nrfarrell.com
N. R. Farrell | Fantasy Romance Author
2 shared topicsromance
75match
annaroche.com
ANNA ROCHE – SCI-FI ROMANCE AUTHOR
2 shared topicsromance
74match
katanacollins.com
Katana Collins – Contemporary Romance and Erotica Author
2 shared topicsromance
73match
erinbedford.com
Paranormal and Fantasy Romance Author Erin Bedford
2 shared topicsromance
72match
analeegiancoala.com
Analee Giancoala – Dark & Contemporary Romance Author
2 shared topicsromance
72match
shianserei.com
Shiån Serei, Author of Romance Novels and Children's Books
2 shared topicsromance
71match
shilohsloane.com
Shiloh Sloane | Dark Romance Author
2 shared topicsromance
71match
samanthaannwhite.com
Samantha Ann White – Romance Fantasy Fiction Author
2 shared topicsromance
71match
debbiecromack.com
Debbie Cromack | Romance Author
2 shared topicsromance
71match
alexevansauthor.com
HOME | Alex Evans Author
2 shared topicsromance
71match
sorenblacke.com
Soren Blacke — Dark Romance Author
2 shared topicsromance
70match
celiacrown.com
Celia Crown | Dark Romance Author
2 shared topicsromance
70match
aylavolk.com
Shifter Romance | Ayla Volk - Fantasy Romance Author
2 shared topicsromance
70match
eringreybooks.com
Erin Grey | Gothic Mystery Romance Author
2 shared topicsromance

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.