Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to aistsw.net

AIST Software – Scientific Software · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
68match
matrixscientific.com
Matrix Scientific
1 shared topicschemistry
67match
cmandascientific.com
Cmanda Scientific Enterprise
1 shared topicschemistry
67match
advancedfertilizersystems.com
Home - Redhill Scientific
1 shared topicschemistry
67match
lab-mtss.com
Modern Technical For Scientific Supplies
1 shared topicschemistry
66match
massspec.com
Sierra Analytics – Advanced Mass Spectrometry Software
1 shared topicschemistry
66match
cambtech.co.uk 🇬🇧
Cambridge Scientific Technologies Ltd
1 shared topicschemistry
66match
adhme.net
BDH Laboratory and Scientific Equipment
1 shared topicschemistry
66match
0-1chem.com
Accelerating Scientific Discovery | 0-1chem
1 shared topicschemistry
65match
nexmino.com
NEXMINO Research-Grade Peptides for Scientific Use
1 shared topicschemistry
65match
grignard.com
Grignard – Company
1 shared topicschemistry
65match
gthlabs.com
GTH Labs – GTH Labs
1 shared topicschemistry
65match
matimata.com
Reagents for Science & Industry – Bausch Chemicals
1 shared topicschemistry
65match
nevadacitymetals.com
Reagents for Science & Industry – Bausch Chemicals
1 shared topicschemistry
65match
bluthane.com
Bluthane – Specialty Polyurethane Products
1 shared topicschemistry
65match
grigroup.co.uk 🇬🇧
Gri Group – Gri Group
1 shared topicschemistry
65match
divinetechscientific.com
Scientific Laboratory Equipment suppliers in India
1 shared topicschemistry
64match
5bchemicals.com
5bChemicals – 5bChemicals
1 shared topicschemistry
64match
ionicchemicalsusa.com
Ionic Chemicals – Minerals
1 shared topicschemistry

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.