similar sites

Browse

AI Report Tools

Sites similar to ainainformatics.com

Ainainformatics alternatives & similar sites

Place-based genomics, genome science education in Hawaiʻi — ʻIolani Community Science — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Genetics →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
appliedgenomics.co.uk ↗	65 match 2 shared topics	Applied Genomics \| Home	GB en	genetics HubSpot	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
joshuapenalba.com ↗	65 match 2 shared topics	Dr. Joshua Peñalba \| evolution . genomics . speciation	en	biological-sciences WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
cdgenomics.com ↗	65 match 2 shared topics	Comprehensive Sequencing, Genotyping & Bioinformatics \| CD Genomics	en	genetics WordPress	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	none
b-kleine.com ↗	64 match 2 shared topics	Bernhard Kleine's Science Blog \| Science to go!	en	genetics WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
fecundator.io ↗	64 match 2 shared topics	Fecundator — Genomic Intelligence for Breeding	en	genetics	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
samhirst.com ↗	64 match 2 shared topics	Sam Hirst \| Evolutionary Genomics	en	biological-sciences	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
123genomics.com ↗	64 match 2 shared topics	123genomics - a Genomics, Proteomics and Bioinformatics Knowledge Base	en	genetics	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
svenkasser.com ↗	64 match 2 shared topics	Sven Kasser \| Computational Genomics & Evolutionary Anthropology	en	biological-sciences	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
plantflowcytometry.com ↗	64 match 2 shared topics	Plant Flow Lab – Genome size determination and plant ploidy analysis testing services. Located in the USA, we are experienced plant scientists who use state-of-the-art flow cytometry equipment and techniques to progress your breeding or research projects	en	biological-sciences WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
cucurbitgenomics.org ↗	63 match 2 shared topics	Cucurbit Genomics Database (CuGenDB)	en	biological-sciences Drupal	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
adbscience.org ↗	63 match 2 shared topics	ADB Science	en	genetics	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
crystmals.tech ↗	63 match 2 shared topics	Crystal Genome Lab \| $crystmals	en	genetics	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
bergeylab.org ↗	63 match 2 shared topics	Bergey Lab – Ecological and evolutionary genomics	en	biological-sciences WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
cbergey.com ↗	63 match 2 shared topics	Bergey Lab – Ecological and evolutionary genomics	en	biological-sciences WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
bendickins.net ↗	63 match 2 shared topics	Dickins Lab · mutations \| genomics \| evolution	en	biological-sciences	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
julianaverylab.com ↗	63 match 2 shared topics	AVERY WILDLIFE CONSERVATION LAB - Home	US~ en	biological-sciences Weebly	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
beavergenome.org ↗	63 match 2 shared topics	North American Beaver Genome Project \| Beaver Genome Project	US~ en	genetics WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
aviangenetics.com ↗	63 match 2 shared topics	Home Page for aviangenetics.com, avian genetics information	en	genetics	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.