Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to aimstats.org

Aim Stats - Analytic Tools · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
68match
rlanalytic.com
RLAnalytic | Home
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
67match
thenexussentinel.com
NEXUS Analytics - Gaming Police
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
66match
neuralfrag.com
CS2 Stat Tracker — Free CS2 Stats & Analytics | Neuralfrag
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
65match
roguestab.com
roguestab — personal gaming analytics
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
65match
rofolio.com
Roblox Limiteds Analytics Database Site
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
65match
bobsnadenica.com
Random Tools
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
65match
ktnuity.com
Kirbot Stats
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
64match
big-bunny.org
Big Bunny | Premium Gaming Analytics Platform & Statistical Analysis
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
64match
bloxscope.com
Bloxscope — Roblox Analytics for Game Developers
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
64match
fanfaceit.com
Faceit Analyser
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
64match
romonitorstats.com
RoMonitor Stats
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
64match
thestaticmage.com
The Static Mage
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
64match
krxteam.com
KRX Team - The Premier Training & Analytics Platform
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
64match
gs4tools.com
GemStone IV Tools
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
64match
picklesdoesgames.com
Dino Mutant Tools
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
64match
pilotgametracker.com
Pilot Tracker - Live Crash Game Statistics, Signals & Analytics | Pilot Tracker
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
64match
donauflix.com
Course Timer Stats
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
64match
2kldev.com
NBA 2K League Tools
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.