Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to aidensanders.dev

Portfolio | Aiden Sanders · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
73match
kylewilk.com
Portfolio | Kyle
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
73match
plumega.com
GP's Portfolio
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
72match
andrewmcguckin.com
Andrew McGuckin - Portfolio
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
72match
fbence.com
Bence Farkas | Portfolio
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
72match
piersrajguru.com
Piers Rajguru - Portfolio
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
72match
amandeepxsingh.tech
Amandeep Singh | Portfolio
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
71match
arulg.tech
Arul G | Software Engineer | SDE Portfolio
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
71match
krisstobbe.com
Portfolio | Kristoffer Stobbe
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
71match
mattsibson.com
Matt Sibson - Portfolio
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
71match
arnav-sethi.com
Arnav Sethi | Portfolio
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
71match
kumarashish.com
Ashish Kumar | Portfolio
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
70match
aldodev.org
Aldo Lucchetta - Portfolio
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
70match
kyleblee.com
Kyle Lee - Portfolio
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
70match
pranavsrinivasan.com
Pranav Srinivasan - Portfolio
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
70match
alexmccairel.dev
Alex McCairel | Portfolio
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
70match
robertpopeii.com
Robert Pope II | Portfolio
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
70match
aryankashyap.com
Aryan's Portfolio
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
69match
arslanbekzhaparov.com
Arslan's Portfolio
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.