Piperic
similar sites
‹ profileTools

Sites similar to aidangee.dev

Aidan Gee - Full Stack developer · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
84match
mohibkhan.com
Full Stack Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
83match
ivinny.com
Vinay - Full Stack Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
82match
oceanyu.dev
Ocean Yu - Full Stack Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
82match
aakashpr.com
Aakash PR — Full Stack Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
82match
heresmateo.dev
Mateo Kapllani - Full Stack Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
82match
hermanliu.com
Herman Liu - Full Stack Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
81match
piyawong.com
Piyawong - Full Stack Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
81match
cotneo.com
Furkan Akar | Full Stack Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
81match
itshaseeb.com
Haseeb Ahmed - Full Stack Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
81match
anasbelbaz.com
Anas | Full stack developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
81match
annappagowda.com
Annappa Gowda — Full Stack Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
81match
batuhan.io
Batuhan Korur - Full Stack Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
81match
isamchajia.com
Isam Chajia - Full Stack Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
81match
planetmalone.com
Sean Malone - Full Stack Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
81match
aakardesai.com
Your Portfolio - Full Stack Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
81match
abdulsami.app
Abdul Sami — Full Stack Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
80match
surajgupta.dev
Suraj Gupta - Full Stack Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
80match
surajdivekar.com
Suraj Divekar — Full Stack Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.