Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to ahmadnajm.dev

Ahmad Najm- Personal Portfolio · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
82match
iolasava.com
Iolasava – Personal Portfolio
2 shared topicsweb-development
80match
arsalanahadi.com
Portfolio
2 shared topicsweb-development
78match
abhishek-chaudhary.com
Portfolio
2 shared topicsweb-development
77match
arsalansaif.com
Home - Personal Portfolio
2 shared topicsweb-design-and-html
76match
abel-adane.tech
Hebel's Portfolio
2 shared topicsweb-design-and-html
75match
matehm.com
Matthias | Personal Portfolio
2 shared topicsweb-development
75match
bengeraghty.com
Ben Geraghty - Personal Portfolio
2 shared topicsweb-development
75match
mattraydev.com
Matt Ray dev portfolio
2 shared topicsweb-design-and-html
74match
aacportfolio.com
AAc Portfolio
2 shared topicsweb-development
74match
kumarsumit.com
Sumit Kumar | Portfolio
2 shared topicsweb-design-and-html
74match
dmobasheri.com
Mohammad Mobasheri | Personal Portfolio
2 shared topicsweb-development
73match
ksaibati.com
Yusuf Ksaibati Portfolio
2 shared topicsweb-development
73match
phosg.com
PHOSG.com - Personal Portfolio Site of James McGinley
2 shared topicsweb-development
73match
bioda.info
Bioda - Personal Portfolio Nandlal Rajak
2 shared topicsweb-development
73match
matrixmatt.com
Matt's Portfolio
2 shared topicsweb-design-and-html
72match
bhanuu.tech
Portfolio | Creative Developer
2 shared topicsweb-development
72match
ashleybrookes.dev
Portfolio
2 shared topicsweb-development
72match
abdelrahmanmerdanportfolio.com
Abdelrahman Merdan Portfolio
2 shared topicsweb-development

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.