Piperic
similar sites
‹ profileTools

Sites similar to agoodsoftware.com

A Good Software - · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
75match
bayinfosystems.com
Bad Software
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
72match
plungesoftware.com
PLUNGE SOFTWARE
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
72match
softwaretester.us 🇺🇸
Software Tester
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
71match
softwaretesters.us 🇺🇸
Software Testers
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
71match
100topsoftware.com
100 Top Software Sites
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
71match
100topsoftwaresites.com
100 Top Software Sites
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
69match
rewiredsoftware.com
Rewired Software – A blog.
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
69match
instinctsoftware.co.uk 🇬🇧
instinctsoftware
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
69match
hezaerd.com
Hezaerd - Software Engineer
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
69match
investigatingsoftware.co.uk 🇬🇧
Investigating Software
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
69match
bastienfaivre.com
Bastien Faivre - Software Engineer
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
69match
issoftwaredevelopmentdead.com
Is Software Development Dead?
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
69match
kobelei.com
Kobe Lei - Software Developer
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
68match
andrewlau.dev
Andrew Lau | Software Engineer
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
68match
andy-berry.com
Musings of a Software Engineer
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
68match
shenghangao.com
Stefan Gao | Software Engineer
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
68match
andypagdin.com
Andy Pagdin - Software Engineer
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
68match
doncrislip.com
Don Crislip: Software Tech Lead
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.