Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to aggregate.org

The Aggregate · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
63match
gregbalke.com
Greg Balke
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
63match
theobsessor.com
The Obsessor
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
62match
cohaagen.com
Vilos Cohaagen
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
62match
gsconrad.com
Gregory Conrad
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
62match
farlaketech.com
The Farlake Lab
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
62match
gregoryfrazier.com
Greg's Dev Blog
2 shared topicscomputing
62match
ironyuppie.com
The Iron Yuppie
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
62match
theloonysquad.com
The Loony Squad
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
62match
themakermedic.com
The Maker Medic
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
62match
compcafehosting.com
The Computer Cafe
2 shared topicscomputing
62match
greggant.com
Greg Gant Portfolio
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
62match
aspinwall.me
The Aspinwall.me Home Page @ http://www.aspinwall.me
2 shared topicscomputing
62match
acamug.org
The Atlantic City Area Macintosh Users Group (ACAMUG)
2 shared topicscomputing
62match
themainframe.net
The Mainframe Homepage
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
62match
labbookpages.co.uk 🇬🇧
Home - The Lab Book Pages
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
62match
acm-stoc.org
ACM STOC Conference: The ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing
2 shared topicscomputing
62match
newtontalk.com
The NewtonTalk Mailing List
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
61match
acc-designs.com
Analog Circuits Custom Design – The Art of Analog Design
2 shared topicscomputing

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.