Piperic Business Intelligence
similar sites
‹ profile

Sites similar to agedroot.com

Aged Root LLC · ranked by category · tech stack · backlink co-citation
70match
hfbladeco.com
HF Blade Co.
4 co-citations4 shared tech1 shared categoryshopping
70match
2gramcam.com
2 Gram Cam
4 co-citations4 shared tech1 shared categoryshopping
68match
kennethrobinsonii.com
Kenneth Robinson II
5 co-citations3 shared tech1 shared categoryshopping
68match
hatpens.com
Hatpens
4 co-citations4 shared tech1 shared categoryshopping
68match
allbackmoon.com
All Back Moon
4 co-citations4 shared tech1 shared categoryshopping
68match
1permenta.com
1Permenta
4 co-citations4 shared tech1 shared categoryshopping
68match
4gevibe.com
4Ge Vibe
4 co-citations4 shared tech1 shared categoryshopping
68match
admitirversatile.com
ADMITIR VERSATILE
5 co-citations3 shared tech1 shared categoryshopping
68match
apcstyle.com
A.P.C
4 co-citations4 shared tech1 shared categoryshopping
68match
diahrio.com
Diah
4 co-citations4 shared tech1 shared categoryshopping
68match
digitalamericallc.com
Digital America
4 co-citations4 shared tech1 shared categoryshopping
68match
fgomla.com
FGOMLA
3 co-citations4 shared tech1 shared categoryshopping
66match
2pwear.com
2P
4 co-citations3 shared tech1 shared categoryshopping
65match
aerixro.com
AERIX
3 co-citations4 shared tech1 shared categoryshopping
62match
hdayastore.com
Hdaya Store – HdayaStore
2 co-citations4 shared tech1 shared categoryshopping
62match
agamsh.com
My Store
2 co-citations4 shared tech1 shared categoryshopping
62match
coyotemoonapparel.com
Coyote Moon Apparel
2 co-citations4 shared tech1 shared categoryshopping
62match
geriosstore.com
Gerios Store
2 co-citations4 shared tech1 shared categoryshopping

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.